CHAPTER NINETY EIGHT – PART TWO
CHAPTER NINETY EIGHT – PART TWO
Okay, with the Emergency Banking Act and Glass-Steagall,
the people were confident that their banks wouldn’t fail, and if they did, the
federal government would insure their deposits. But they still needed something
to deposit. On to jobs. FDR started with putting money into the pockets of the
young people. FDR himself designed the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), a
program that put young men (ahem!) aged 17 to 24 to work on conservation
projects. Many of the guys were urbanites, and their work carried them to rural
environments, so in addition to lining their pockets, they broadened their
horizons. In three months the Corps grew to 250,000 men who were assigned to
CCC camps all over the country. African American men were signed up, but (no
surprise here) they were forced to work in segregated camps. No women needed to
apply, segregated or otherwise. Still, in nine years the CCC employed three
million men. Eleanor Roosevelt tried to remedy the gender inequity, and with
her support, a smaller program was created for unemployed young women. Thank
God for women like Eleanor and Abigail (“Remember the women”). What did the CCC
do? They planted more than two billion trees, fought forest fires, built
trails, campgrounds and reservoirs and helped with soil conservation programs.
It was one of the most successful programs of the New Deal. Yes, it cost money,
but it put people to work, and the things they built still last to this day in
our national forests and parks.
The CCC and other government work programs made a dent in
the unemployment rate, reducing it from 25 percent to 21 percent in 1934, the
first decrease since 1929. Then private investment started coming back, and it
actually doubled in 1934. See how that works, Tea Party? First the government
kicks in a lot of money to stimulate the economy; then private business has the
assurances it needs that government is doing something to improve the economy
and the privateers start putting their money back into the economy rather than
just sitting on top of it. It could work again, if only Congress would let it.
It worked so well that in the 1934 elections the voters were so pleased with
the way things were going that they voted in even more Democrats in both Houses
to continue the forward economic progress. This prompted FDR to expand his New
Deal programs in 1935. Congress had already passed the National Industrial
Recovery Act in 1933, which guaranteed workers the right to organize and
bargain collectively. But it was after the mid-term elections that the Wagner
Act became law. It re-affirmed the workers’ right to organize unions, and it
also required employers to bargain with union reps. It also increased the power
of the National Labor Relations Board to mediate labor disputes. With the
passage of these two laws, union organizers were able to get a much larger percentage
of workers to join unions. The percentage of unionized employees increased from
7 percent to 34 percent between 1933 and 1945.
FDR was just as concerned about securing economic
protection for citizens as they reached old age as he was about providing jobs
for the young. In 1935 he signed the Social Security Act. In so doing, he said:
“We can never insure one hundred percent of the population against one hundred
percent of the hazards and vicissitudes of life. But we have tried to frame a
law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to
his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age.” Man
oh man, that guy could turn a phrase – and hit the nail on the head. Protection
for the average citizen – that’s what the Social Security Act intended. To
prevent older citizens from living in poverty – that was the goal. So tell me,
why did President Reagan think he was entitled to Social Security? Surely he
did not consider himself “average” and surely he was not facing an old age in
poverty. But with rich folks like him milking Social Security, the whole
purpose of the law has become perverted. Oh, I get it. Rich people contribute
to Social Security throughout their working lives and they are entitled to a
return on that investment. Perhaps they might consider taking a smaller return
on their investment, if they really don’t need the money. Just saying. This is
the kind of private charity I can get behind; maybe President Hoover would even
have approved.
But even with its flaws, the Social Security Act was by
far the biggest domestic achievement of all of FDR’s terms. It not only created
old-age pensions and unemployment insurance, which were funded by payroll taxes
on workers and employers, but it also provided grants to states to help
disabled people and fatherless children. As a fatherless child from the age of
13 on, I am very grateful to FDR for creating this benefit, because it made it
possible for my mother to support me and three siblings and also made my
college education a reality. Oh yes, my mother went to work as soon as my
father died, but with women’s wages being so much lower than men’s in the 50’s
(and even now), the Social Security death benefits kept us above the poverty
level. Thank you, Mr. Roosevelt and Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins.
These first four years of FDR’s Presidency showed that he
was indeed willing to experiment with social programs, if he felt the action he
was taking would improve the economy for all citizens, but particularly those
citizens who lost their jobs and were living in poverty as a result of the
Great Depression, followed by four years of total inaction by Hoover’s regime. And
when he was nominated for a second term, FDR recognized the virtues of bold governmental
action to improve the economy. In his acceptance speech given June 27, 1936,
the nominee stated: “Better the occasional faults of a government that lives in
a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a government frozen in the
ice of its own indifference.” A “spirit of charity” – where is that spirit
today? Why does it seem that all we have is a mean spirit, one that blames the
47% for not earning enough wages to support themselves and require governmental
assistance like food stamps? It seems simple enough to understand that when businesses
do not pay a living wage, workers cannot live without government assistance.
And it also seems simple enough that any far-sighted businessman should be able
to see that a healthy economy depends on employees earning living wages. It
does NOT depend on businesses amassing obscene profits (Exxon anyone?) and
either salting them away or throwing them away on hellishly high executive
wages, benefits and bonuses. Greed was never good, not even in the 1980’s, but
especially now, when so many are trying to live on so little.
Let’s close the book on FDR, as I have to leave his
Library to return to Slow Motion and head to the Erie Canal. I realize I only
covered his first term in office. You’ll have to go to Hyde Park yourself to
learn about the other three terms. Maybe you think I’ve presented too rosy a
picture of FDR and his accomplishments, but any objective commentator will
admit that the first term was an amazing period of change for the good of the
economy. And, to be fair, the commentaries that are written all over the
Library with various exhibits are not all glowing, because not everything FDR
touched turned to gold. There is coverage of the “Roosevelt Recession” in
1937-38. In September, 1937 FDR announced major spending cuts in an effort to
balance the budget. To ward off inflation, he supported efforts to tighten
credit. And, of course (déjà vu), as government spending decreased and interest
rates increased, economic progress not only came to a standstill, but dropped
off considerably. By March 1938 unemployment, which had gone as low as 14
percent was back up to 19 percent.
What FDR had, which the current President will not have,
is a major worldwide war to pull the United States out of that recession and to
grow the economy – the war economy by leaps and bounds. He already started
increasing defense spending in 1939, in light of Hitler’s successes in trampling
upon and subjugating major European countries. Naturally, as spending increased,
the budget deficits got a lot larger. However, the spending stimulated growth
throughout the American economy, and unemployment went from 19 percent to 9.9
percent in 1941. It just takes a humongous war, a supermajority in Congress,
and a President who cares more about people than a deficit to right the
American economy in times of recession. By 1944, economic growth – based in
large part on the expansion of the armed forces – reduced unemployment to 1.2
percent. Do you think that “Shrub” (Gov. Anne Richards’ nickname for Bush II)
was hoping to achieve the same results with his wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
For a while he was able to use the hawks in his party to keep the deficit
squawkers in line. But with that peacenik Obama in the White House now, the
deficit squawkers don’t have to knuckle under to patriotic hawks. They can
cloak themselves in a new perversion of patriotism – it’s un-American in their
eyes to spend money on social programs. Balancing the budget has become a new
religion, because it sure ain’t good economics in a recession. It’s hard to
swallow that our country is at its most prosperous in wartime, but that’s the
raw truth. When we’re not at war on a foreign shore, we seem to turn our
belligerence on each other. Who should we blame? Who can we be better than? Who
can we hate? Divide and be conquered from within. Wake up, America. Read a
little history. See that we’ve been in this place before, and accept that we
have to spend our way out of a recession. Every day Paul Krugman tells us this.
Let’s listen. Better yet, let’s get our government to melt the ice of its own
indifference and return to a spirit of charity toward its neediest citizens.
For those of you who read this blog for the travel
adventures, I will return to descriptions of our cruising on Slow Motion in
Chapter 99, from the Rondout Yacht Basin to Shady Harbor to Waterford – and through
the first 5 locks of the Erie Canal. You are in for a treat. I might even
mention my side trip today to the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New
York. Be still, my heart.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home